Court lets Trump admin force some terminally ill patients to work for health care
A federal judge on Thursday denied a request by more than two dozen Democratic states to halt a Trump administration policy announced last month that would require Medicaid recipients with terminal diseases to prove they are too sick to work in order to be exempt from new work requirements that go i. . .
U. S. Rep. Sheri Biggs (R-SC), Rep. Joe Wilson (R-SC), U. S. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), U. S. Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), U. S. Sen. Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) and U. S. Vice President JD Vance during a ceremony for late Republican Senator Lindsey Graham in the rotunda of the US Capitol in Washington, DC, US, on Tuesday, July 28, 2026. Tierney L. Cross/Pool via REUTERSA federal judge on Thursdaydenieda request by more than two dozen Democratic states to halt aTrump administrationpolicy announced last month that would requireMedicaidrecipients with terminal diseases to prove they are too sick to work in order to be exempt from new work requirements that go into effect this coming January. Whileintroducingover $1 trillion intax cutsfor the wealthiest 1% of Americans, last year’s massiveGOPtax andbudgetbill also imposed new 80-hour-per-month work requirements that states must implement for Medicaid expansion recipients, who receive government-subsidized insurance coverage at or below 138% of thepovertyline. The law specified that those who are “medically frail or otherwise have special medical needs” are excluded from the work requirement, and specifically listed people with a “serious or complex medical condition. ” But it remained unclear what exact conditions met these criteria. Earlier this month, the Centers forMedicareand Medicaid Services (CMS) introduced anew rulestating that even if a person receives a terminal diagnosis for a disease like cancer, HIV/AIDS, or Parkinson’s, that is still not enough for them to be exempt from the work requirements. Beginning on January 1, 2028, it says they must also demonstrate to states that their condition “significantly impairs” their ability to meet the work requirement. Democratic attorneys general in 25 states and the District of Columbia filed a preliminary injunction over the rule late last month, arguing that CMS had rewritten the law to introduce a vague and needlessly restrictive new hurdle that vulnerable people will face in obtaining desperately needed care. “This is one of those cases where it’s really hard to overstate how dire the consequences could be,” North Carolina’s Democratic attorney general, Jeff Jackson,told Politico. “You’re going to have 50 states doing 50 different things, and we’re all going to have to create a whole new bureaucracy. . . You are talking about a lot more paperwork, more evaluations, more doctor visits, and a lot more work for doctors themselves. ”The Democratic AGs argued that implementation of the work requirements should be paused because they lacked the staff or capacity to meet the timeline set by CMS, which requires states to communicate to enrollees how they’ll be affected by the changes by the end of August. US District Judge Richard Stearns on Thursday denied their initial request to immediately halt the implementation of the requirements while the lawsuit proceeds, but also did not rule on the lawsuit’s merits, which are scheduled to be decided before the requirements go into effect on January 1. Several medical associations, including theAmerican Medical Association, theAmerican College of Physicians, and theAmerican Academy of Pediatrics, have come out against the rule, arguing that it would have dire consequences for people who suffer from severe illness. “One of the most significant factors in whether someone survives a cancer diagnosis is whether they have health insurance coverage,” Lisa Lacasse, president of the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network,explainedin June. “The new restrictions link the definition of medical frailty to a person’s ability to work,” she continued. “This would mean cancer patients and survivors who are suffering from debilitating side effects of the disease or treatment would have to officially prove they can’t work, in a process that is likely to be difficult and take a long time. ”The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office hasprojectedthat over the coming decade, changes tohealthcarepolicy introduced byRepublicanswould increase the number of uninsured Americans by about 11. 8 million. Around 5. 7 million of them are projected to be Medicaid recipients who either do not meet the 80-hour work requirement or are otherwise eligible but tripped up by one of the newly imposed paperwork hurdles. Taya Graham and Stephen Janis argued earlier this week in apiecefor The Real News Network that eligible people losing coverage is not an unfortunate side effect of the law, but a goal of the Republicans who passed it, who sought a way to thin the ranks of those who qualify for Medicaid without having to take the politically unpopular step of actually clawing back benefits. They wrote that what has happened to recipients of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) illustrates how burdensome these new requirements may become. As TheNew York Timesreportedearlier this month, in Arizona, 440,000 people have already been dropped from SNAP after it enacted a formidable regime of paperwork for low-income recipients to prove eligibility, including requiring some people with panhandling income to obtain documentation from donors who drop them a buck on the street. “If this is what people receiving SNAP benefits have been subjected to,” Graham and Janis wrote, “imagine what’s going to happen to people who will need to navigate the new [Medicaid] requirements while struggling with a debilitating or terminal illness. ”Medical issues are aleading causeof bankruptcy in the US. According toone study, over 4 in 10 cancer patients over 50 had depleted all their assets within two years of diagnosis. Melanie D’Arrigo, a campaigner forsingle-payerhealthcarein New York,saidthat PresidentDonald Trump“cut cancer research, cut healthcare,” and with new Medicaid restrictions, “wants to make sure Americans continue to work as they go broke battling cancer. ”