Sudbury letters: On the Gordie Howe Bridge, climate change and arms race
Skip to ContentNewsLocal NewsProvincialCanadaWorldSpecial-SectionsSportsSports BettingLocal SportsBaseballBasketballFootballCurlingHockeyOther SportsAuto RacingEntertainmentLocal. . .
Skip to ContentNewsLocal NewsProvincialCanadaWorldSpecial-SectionsSportsSports BettingLocal SportsBaseballBasketballFootballCurlingHockeyOther SportsAuto RacingEntertainmentLocal EntertainmentMoviesMusicTelevisionBooksGamingCelebritiesLifeTravelFoodHealthComicsPuzzlesAdviceOpinionEditorialColumnLettersAll NewspapersAdvertisingAdvertising With UsAdvertising SolutionsPostmedia Ad ManagerSponsorship RequestsClassifiedsObituariesLives ToldBusiness AdsJobsDrivingHealthingPuzzmoDiversionsPuzzlesComicsNewslettersProfileSettingsMy SubscriptionsNewslettersCustomer ServiceFAQNewsSportsEntertainmentLifeOpinionAll NewspapersBusiness AdsJobsDrivingHealthingPuzzmoNewslettersOpinionLettersSudbury letters: On the Gordie Howe Bridge, climate change and arms racePublished Jul 25, 2026•Last updated 18 minutes ago•1 minute readWorkers are shown at the Gordie Howe International Bridge in Detroit on Tuesday, February 10, 2026. Photo by Dan Janisse/The Windsor StarDefending the prime ministerIn the past several weeks, I have heard various politicians and read newspaper editorials and letters to the editor about the Gordie Howe Bridge. Almost all of them criticized Prime Minister Mark Carney for caving in to Donald Trump and the U. S. A. Recommended VideosHowever, I have not seen those same people explicitly say what they would have done under the same circumstances. The closest I have read is that they would have adopted a “hard line” if they had to negotiate the issue. That is a vague statement and tells us absolutely nothing. We have no idea about the negotiating tactics that Carney or government officials used in their discussions. No doubt it will come out someday. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but without giving any indication of your possible solution, it’s just criticism that goes nowhere. Terry MartynSudburyRenewable energy could solve a lot of problemsWith our hot weather and smoke destroying our air quality, we must ask why and what we can do about it. Our climate is changing adversely with more frequent and extreme weather due to the burning of fossil fuels. We need to use renewables – wind and solar – for our sources of electricity, and not spend on nuclear power, which is very expensive and will raise our taxes and take more than 10 years to build. Our roads here in the north, highways 69 and 11, are not safe for people. Will they be safe for trucking nuclear waste to Ignace in northwestern Ontario?Both our provincial and federal governments are spending huge amounts of money on nuclear power and the military while Ontario and Canada are burning. Why has Ontario cut back on the number of forest firefighters?Why are we not hiring pilots to fly water bombers?We, here in Ontario and Canada, are having an immediate risk from forest fires, floods, and tornadoes that needs to be addressed now, not 2050. Richard DentonSudburyJoin the ConversationThis website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more aboutcookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to ourTerms of UseandPrivacy Policy.