The architecture of socialist science and ambitions in Soviet Scientific Institutes
Architecture04mins. readPhotographer Eric Lusito documents the Soviet Union’s laboratories, reactors and other scientific buildings across the former USSR landscape in a new book by FUEL. byBansari. . .
Architecture04mins. readPhotographer Eric Lusito documents the Soviet Union’s laboratories, reactors and other scientific buildings across the former USSR landscape in a new book by FUEL. byBansari PaghdarPublished on : Jul 09, 2026Modernismas a movement and modernity as an all-consuming idea—a concept of living wrought upon the world in the 19th and 20th centuries—had, broadly speaking, different interpretations in the western and eastern halves of the globe. At their core, though, they were bolstered by the idea of unmitigated progress driven by scientific endeavour. The idea of ‘taming’—nature, space, the atom itself—became apparently central to the belief, with the machinic taking over a big part of people’s daily lives. The architectural ramifications of this period—what we collectively, and largely, construe as an umbrella withmodernist architecture—were profound, even if differentiated across the world by prevalent socio-political conditions. That polarisation was especially significant in the case of the two Cold War factions, and the Soviet faction—beginning from around the USSR’s founding in 1922, its rise to a scientific and intellectual superpower buttressed by Communism around the close of theSecond World War, up until the dissolution of the union in 1991—offers a fascinating case study. A mural at the Radiophysics Research Institute’s control room depicts the reflector alongside other Armenian symbolsImage: Eric Lusito, Courtesy of FUEL PublishingThe anechoic chamber at the Radiophysics Research Institute in ArmeniaImage: Eric Lusito, Courtesy of FUEL PublishingMassive tilemurals—such asMasters of Time(1975) by artists Halyna Zubchenko and Hryhoriy Prysheddko at the Institute of Cybernetics inKyiv,Ukraine—were a common sight in the disparate scientific institutions built by the USSR. Another mural at the Institute of Radio Astronomy’s Braude Observatory depicts a man at the centre of 12 zodiac signs and several mathematical formulae, listening to signals from space. Between man harnessing the power of the atom to the secrets of outer space, portrayals such as these cast the envisioned scientific progress as inevitable. As these facilities forwarded the state’s collective socio-cultural ideology, theirarchitecturetoo came to symbolise Soviet ambitions and reflect the futures they sought to realise. Buildings housing the ARUS synchrotron facility at the Yerevan Physics Institute in ArmeniaImage: Eric Lusito, Courtesy of FUEL PublishingScientist Stassia, who has worked at the Yerevan Physics Institute since 1966, traversing electrical cables and connections on the rooftopImage: Eric Lusito, Courtesy of FUEL PublishingAragats Cosmic Ray Research Station is located in the remote region of Mount Aragats, ArmeniaImage: Eric Lusito, Courtesy of FUEL PublishingThis intersection ofSoviet architecture,scienceand ideology is at the heart ofphotographerEric Lusito’s bookSoviet Scientific Institutes, published by FUEL. Spanning observatories, nuclear reactors, radio telescopes, laboratories and more across the former USSR, the book features an introduction by science historian Paul Josephson. Positioning the institutes and Soviet science itself in parallel with scientific colonialism and military conquest, Josephson unpacks layers of Soviet history with context and complexity, setting the tone for thebook. ZTA-2. 6 telescope tower at the Byurakan Astrophysical Observatory in ArmeniaImage: Eric Lusito, Courtesy of FUEL PublishingThe Carl Zeiss telescope pavilion at the Fresenkov Astrophysical Institute in KazakhstanImage: Eric Lusito, Courtesy of FUEL PublishingThearchitectural photographercarries this approach forward in his documentation of the buildings, each accompanied by a text that elaborates on how they were conceived, along with some noteworthy events that changed the trajectory of these institutions, only some of which are still operational today. Lusito’s collection of photographs is especially keen on capturing the sense of abandonment following the bureaucratic, financial and mostly political fallout of most of these institutions, as concurrently as the hope they initially offered. Institute of Materials Science at the Academy of Sciences of Uzbekistan in Parkent, UzbekistanImage: Eric Lusito, Courtesy of FUEL PublishingHeliostates arranged on a slope at the Institute of Materials Science to avoid mutual shadingImage: Eric Lusito, Courtesy of FUEL PublishingEven within the Union, these institutional architectures and infrastructures exist across vastly different climates and geographies, varying in their form and materiality, along with the ways in which they occupy their contexts. For instance, the Aragats Cosmic Ray Research Station in the remote region of Mount Aragats, Armenia, is functionally designed to be self-reliant and appears to be a classic example of brutalist Soviet architecture, stripped not just of ornamentation but also of expressionism. On the other hand, the Fesenkov Astrophysical Institute inKazakhstanappears to be a scaled-up version of the apparatus housed within, proudly hinting at its purpose. Featuring structures such as the Carl Zeiss telescope and the 45-metre-high tower with AZT-20 telescope, the institute blurs the distinction between architecture and machine. A 4. 4-metre cone at the Ventspils International Radio Astronomy Centre in LatviaImage: Eric Lusito, Courtesy of FUEL PublishingThe PPA-25 antenna at the Institute of Ionosphere in Kharkiv, UkraineImage: Eric Lusito, Courtesy of FUEL PublishingInstitutions such as the Institute of Ionosphere in Kharkiv and the Ventspils International Radio Astronomy Centre inLatviaposed architecture as almost secondary to instrumentation. Radio telescopes, often considerably larger than their actual workplace footprint, required expensive, heavy-duty supporting structures such as towers to be lifted to an optimal height for operation. This led to a simpler, more modest style of modernist building that steered away from any aesthetic or formal leanings towards its institutional counterparts. The extraordinary utilitarian demands of scientific research framed the architecture. Romania’s National Institute for Research, Development and Testing in Electrical Engineering evokes the drama of mid-century science fictionImage: Eric Lusito, Courtesy of FUEL PublishingLusito makes a point of capturing almost all of these institutions from within, regardless of whether they were operational, shedding light on the machines and the scientists who have inhabited them. Romania’sNational Institute for Research, Development and Testing in Electrical Engineering, though unassuming from the outside, evokes the drama of mid-centuryscience fictionthrough precisely those means. Enormous equipment, such as an impulse generator and an artificial rain device, takes the spotlight against a dark, bare and neutral backdrop, bringing out the inherent architectural qualities of these assemblies. In contrast, the Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology in Ukraine is seen honouring Kharkiv’s renowned scientists in each employee entrance pass, highlighting the individual contributions and achievements of these professionals. Severalphotographscapture the desks, service and utility areas within the buildings, showing operations at a more human scale, placing the scientists at the centre of the institute’s continued relevance. The Institute of Nuclear Techniques is located on a university campus, built by Hungarian engineers and physicists in the 1960sImage: Eric Lusito, Courtesy of FUEL PublishingReactor core at the Institute of Nuclear Techniques in Budapest, HungaryImage: Eric Lusito, Courtesy of FUEL PublishingReactor hall at the Centre for Energy Research in HungaryImage: Eric Lusito, Courtesy of FUEL PublishingThe synchrotron control room at the Yerevan Physics Institute in ArmeniaImage: Eric Lusito, Courtesy of FUEL PublishingAgeing control panels, receivers’ rooms, telephones, attendance boards and posters are intentionally captured, revealing Lusito’s fascination with analogue scientific culture as much as the buildings’ architecture. Rather than aestheticising the considerable decay or disrepair some of the institutes are under, hisarchitectural photographyoccasionally turns to the people and machines that continue to animate the halls as they look towards the future. “From the grip of the Soviet totalitarian regime to its collapse, and the aftermath that still reverberates today, their motivation to pursue their research—even during a time of war—is truly heroic,” writes Lusito in the afterword. ‘Soviet Scientific Institutes’ is published by FUEL and can be purchasedhere. Read on:Similar ArticlesArchitecture07mins. readArchitecture12mins. readAbout AuthorBansari PaghdarJunior Features WriterWith a background in architecture and intrigue for multi-disciplinary explorations, Bansari constructs narratives by channelling her passion for sensitive, thought-provoking and eccentric materialisations of creative concepts. An inherent curiosity for unknown subjects and distinct worldviews fuels her research and writing. Away from the desk, she plays video games and dissects cinema, dramas and anime. With a background in architecture and intrigue for multi-disciplinary explorations, Bansari constructs narratives by channelling her passion for sensitive, thought-provoking and eccentric materialisations of creative concepts. An inherent curiosity for unknown subjects and distinct worldviews fuels her research and writing. Away from the desk, she plays video games and dissects cinema, dramas and anime. Read moreRecommendedLOAD MOREsee more articlessurprise me!7253,7254,7255,7256,7257